https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349675 Continuation of a mid-term review after initiation of a sunset review was treated as requiring judicial scrutiny, and the Court recorded a prima facie view that simultaneous continuation of both reviews was not permissible on the facts presented. As the authorities had sought extension belatedly, the balance of convenience was found to favour the petitioners and no prejudice was seen in keeping the impugned action in abeyance pending final disposal. Interim protection was therefore granted, and the Union of India was restrained from acting on the impugned final findings until the matter was finally decided. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:51:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349675 Continuation of a mid-term review after initiation of a sunset review was treated as requiring judicial scrutiny, and the Court recorded a prima facie view that simultaneous continuation of both reviews was not permissible on the facts presented. As the authorities had sought extension belatedly, the balance of convenience was found to favour the petitioners and no prejudice was seen in keeping the impugned action in abeyance pending final disposal. Interim protection was therefore granted, and the Union of India was restrained from acting on the impugned final findings until the matter was finally decided. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349675