https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195232 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA requires credible material showing a real and rational likelihood of future prejudicial activity; subjective satisfaction cannot rest on speculation. The detention was challenged because the passport had already been impounded and the adjudication proceedings had ended in confiscation with an option of redemption, leaving no acceptable material to infer that the detenu would again indulge in smuggling. In the absence of such material, the court held that the detention order was unsustainable, vitiated the detaining authority's satisfaction, and the habeas corpus petition was allowed. en-us Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:39:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195232 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA requires credible material showing a real and rational likelihood of future prejudicial activity; subjective satisfaction cannot rest on speculation. The detention was challenged because the passport had already been impounded and the adjudication proceedings had ended in confiscation with an option of redemption, leaving no acceptable material to infer that the detenu would again indulge in smuggling. In the absence of such material, the court held that the detention order was unsustainable, vitiated the detaining authority's satisfaction, and the habeas corpus petition was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195232