<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 780 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195231</link>
    <description>Non-supply of material documents relied upon in a preventive detention decision can vitiate the order where it impairs the detenu&#039;s right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The High Court found that the diary, Form 13 and the authorisation letter were directly relevant to the detaining authority&#039;s satisfaction because they bore on the alleged export transaction and the authority said to have been issued by the detenu. As the request for copies was refused without a clear explanation distinguishing relied-upon from merely referred material, prejudice was caused and the detention order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 780 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195231</link>
      <description>Non-supply of material documents relied upon in a preventive detention decision can vitiate the order where it impairs the detenu&#039;s right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The High Court found that the diary, Form 13 and the authorisation letter were directly relevant to the detaining authority&#039;s satisfaction because they bore on the alleged export transaction and the authority said to have been issued by the detenu. As the request for copies was refused without a clear explanation distinguishing relied-upon from merely referred material, prejudice was caused and the detention order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>