<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1137 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195228</link>
    <description>The SC found the shareholders to be genuine parties and rejected the contention that they were bogus or fictitious. As that factual finding undermined the basis of the impugned order, the Court held that the order could not be sustained. The matter was decided in favour of the assessee, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:48:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1137 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195228</link>
      <description>The SC found the shareholders to be genuine parties and rejected the contention that they were bogus or fictitious. As that factual finding undermined the basis of the impugned order, the Court held that the order could not be sustained. The matter was decided in favour of the assessee, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>