<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 831 - MADRAS  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195227</link>
    <description>Unexplained and inordinate delay between the prejudicial incident and the preventive detention order can snap the live link where the authorities fail to show continuing investigation or other satisfactory basis for the interval. The detention was also held vulnerable because the show cause notice and replies, being material to the basis of detention, were not placed before the Advisory Board. Relevant documents bearing on the detention must be considered to preserve the detenu&#039;s effective representation. On these facts, both the unexplained delay and non-placement of material before the Advisory Board undermined the validity of the detention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 831 - MADRAS  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195227</link>
      <description>Unexplained and inordinate delay between the prejudicial incident and the preventive detention order can snap the live link where the authorities fail to show continuing investigation or other satisfactory basis for the interval. The detention was also held vulnerable because the show cause notice and replies, being material to the basis of detention, were not placed before the Advisory Board. Relevant documents bearing on the detention must be considered to preserve the detenu&#039;s effective representation. On these facts, both the unexplained delay and non-placement of material before the Advisory Board undermined the validity of the detention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>