https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195216 The Metropolitan Magistrate's decision to quash the complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the lack of court's leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, following the company's winding up by the Gujarat High Court, was upheld. The court found that the applicant failed to obtain the necessary permission to continue the proceedings against the company, as required by law. Consequently, the revision application challenging the order was dismissed. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:17:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195216 The Metropolitan Magistrate's decision to quash the complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the lack of court's leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, following the company's winding up by the Gujarat High Court, was upheld. The court found that the applicant failed to obtain the necessary permission to continue the proceedings against the company, as required by law. Consequently, the revision application challenging the order was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195216