<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 45 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10289</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 14.20 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained cash seized during a search under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s assessment was thorough and supported by evidence, concluding that the Assessing Officer had not proven the absence of cash in hand or the expenditure of the seized amount. Therefore, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 45 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10289</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 14.20 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained cash seized during a search under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s assessment was thorough and supported by evidence, concluding that the Assessing Officer had not proven the absence of cash in hand or the expenditure of the seized amount. Therefore, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>