https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349659 A rectification application was rejected because the alleged error was only a reference to an earlier valuation and order number reproduced from the order-in-original, not an accidental mistake in the Tribunal's own order. The Tribunal further noted that the order-in-original in the appeal had already remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals), so the challenged reference did not create any apparent error requiring correction. As no mistake apparent from the record was shown, the application was held not maintainable and was dismissed. en-us Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:20:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349659 A rectification application was rejected because the alleged error was only a reference to an earlier valuation and order number reproduced from the order-in-original, not an accidental mistake in the Tribunal's own order. The Tribunal further noted that the order-in-original in the appeal had already remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals), so the challenged reference did not create any apparent error requiring correction. As no mistake apparent from the record was shown, the application was held not maintainable and was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349659