<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 811 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349656</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the CESTAT&#039;s order was without application of mind and the Department wrongly invoked the extended period of limitation. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Assessee with no orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 811 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349656</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the CESTAT&#039;s order was without application of mind and the Department wrongly invoked the extended period of limitation. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Assessee with no orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>