<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 804 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349649</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner(Appeals) not to impose penalties under Sections 76 &amp;amp; 77, confirming the imposition of penalty only under Section 78. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents to justify that if penalty was imposed under Section 78 for deliberate evasion, penalties under Sections 76 &amp;amp; 77 may not be warranted. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the distinction between the provisions of Sections 76 and 78 in cases of tax evasion with intent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 804 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349649</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner(Appeals) not to impose penalties under Sections 76 &amp;amp; 77, confirming the imposition of penalty only under Section 78. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents to justify that if penalty was imposed under Section 78 for deliberate evasion, penalties under Sections 76 &amp;amp; 77 may not be warranted. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the distinction between the provisions of Sections 76 and 78 in cases of tax evasion with intent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>