<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 791 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349636</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s. Multi-Flex Lami-Print Ltd. against the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit was dismissed by the court. The court relied on precedents, including the decision in BDH Industries Ltd., where it was held that the appellant was not entitled to take credit suo moto when goods were not cleared against the debited duty. Despite attempts to distinguish the case based on different facts, the court upheld the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit, emphasizing consistency with established decisions. The judgment was pronounced on 23/08/17.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:18:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 791 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349636</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s. Multi-Flex Lami-Print Ltd. against the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit was dismissed by the court. The court relied on precedents, including the decision in BDH Industries Ltd., where it was held that the appellant was not entitled to take credit suo moto when goods were not cleared against the debited duty. Despite attempts to distinguish the case based on different facts, the court upheld the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit, emphasizing consistency with established decisions. The judgment was pronounced on 23/08/17.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>