<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 785 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC. They found no evidence of intent to evade duty and emphasized the lack of suppression. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs as the impugned order was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 785 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC. They found no evidence of intent to evade duty and emphasized the lack of suppression. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs as the impugned order was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>