<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1274 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision in appeals filed by Revenue against CIT(A) orders for various assessment years. It was held that the respondent society was not required to deduct TDS under sec. 194C on payments to the developer as the transactions were for the purchase of developed sites, not a works contract. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of agreement terms and the society&#039;s role as a facilitator, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1274 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision in appeals filed by Revenue against CIT(A) orders for various assessment years. It was held that the respondent society was not required to deduct TDS under sec. 194C on payments to the developer as the transactions were for the purchase of developed sites, not a works contract. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the interpretation of agreement terms and the society&#039;s role as a facilitator, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>