<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1399 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195205</link>
    <description>Reopening of a completed assessment under sections 147 and 148 requires recorded reasons to disclose prima facie material showing a rational nexus and live link with escapement of income. A mere suspicion, suggestion that capital gains may not have been offered, or a proposal to verify the return is insufficient, because the reasons themselves must show more than a possibility of enquiry and cannot be supplemented later. On the stated reasoning, the recorded reasons did not establish escapement of income, but only indicated further investigation. The reassessment proceedings were therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1399 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195205</link>
      <description>Reopening of a completed assessment under sections 147 and 148 requires recorded reasons to disclose prima facie material showing a rational nexus and live link with escapement of income. A mere suspicion, suggestion that capital gains may not have been offered, or a proposal to verify the return is insufficient, because the reasons themselves must show more than a possibility of enquiry and cannot be supplemented later. On the stated reasoning, the recorded reasons did not establish escapement of income, but only indicated further investigation. The reassessment proceedings were therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>