<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1706 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195208</link>
    <description>A company seeking approval of a proposed scheme of amalgamation obtained dispensation of meetings where all equity shareholders and compulsory convertible redeemable preference shareholders had consented to the scheme, and the transferor company had no secured or unsecured creditors. On that record, convening separate meetings would serve no practical purpose, so the shareholders&#039; meetings were dispensed with and no creditors&#039; meeting was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1706 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195208</link>
      <description>A company seeking approval of a proposed scheme of amalgamation obtained dispensation of meetings where all equity shareholders and compulsory convertible redeemable preference shareholders had consented to the scheme, and the transferor company had no secured or unsecured creditors. On that record, convening separate meetings would serve no practical purpose, so the shareholders&#039; meetings were dispensed with and no creditors&#039; meeting was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>