<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1066 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that changes in the Mutual Fund scheme altered its fundamental attributes, affecting unitholders&#039; interests. Respondents were directed to comply with Regulation 18(15A) and provide an exit route for appellants. The Tribunal invoked its powers under Rule 21 to secure justice, with each party bearing its costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:23:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=493034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1066 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that changes in the Mutual Fund scheme altered its fundamental attributes, affecting unitholders&#039; interests. Respondents were directed to comply with Regulation 18(15A) and provide an exit route for appellants. The Tribunal invoked its powers under Rule 21 to secure justice, with each party bearing its costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>