<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 783 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349628</link>
    <description>Following the introduction of GST, the Court held that the petitioner association&#039;s grievance over the tax treatment of ongoing works contracts and the resulting burden should be examined by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, as the competent departmental authority. The pending representation required an administrative decision on merits, and the Court also noted the Government Order reducing GST on works contracts for Government work and providing for on-account payments pending guidelines. The Commissioner was therefore directed to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law within four weeks after giving the association an opportunity of personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 783 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349628</link>
      <description>Following the introduction of GST, the Court held that the petitioner association&#039;s grievance over the tax treatment of ongoing works contracts and the resulting burden should be examined by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, as the competent departmental authority. The pending representation required an administrative decision on merits, and the Court also noted the Government Order reducing GST on works contracts for Government work and providing for on-account payments pending guidelines. The Commissioner was therefore directed to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law within four weeks after giving the association an opportunity of personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>