<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 58 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10275</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposition of Rs. 13,000 on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the application of Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) and emphasizing the need for explanations on disputed income sources. The penalty was determined based on the law applicable at the time of filing the return, in accordance with legal precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 58 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10275</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposition of Rs. 13,000 on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the application of Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) and emphasizing the need for explanations on disputed income sources. The penalty was determined based on the law applicable at the time of filing the return, in accordance with legal precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>