<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 779 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349624</link>
    <description>The court upheld the deduction claim under Section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act for the transferor enterprise involved in infrastructure facility transfer. It clarified that the transferee enterprise could claim the deduction for the unexpired period during which the transferor would have been entitled to it if the transfer had not occurred. The court emphasized that the transferor would retain the deduction related to infrastructure development, while the transferee could claim deduction for maintenance and operation activities. The tax appeal was dismissed, affirming the deduction eligibility for the transferor despite the transfer of the facility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 779 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349624</link>
      <description>The court upheld the deduction claim under Section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act for the transferor enterprise involved in infrastructure facility transfer. It clarified that the transferee enterprise could claim the deduction for the unexpired period during which the transferor would have been entitled to it if the transfer had not occurred. The court emphasized that the transferor would retain the deduction related to infrastructure development, while the transferee could claim deduction for maintenance and operation activities. The tax appeal was dismissed, affirming the deduction eligibility for the transferor despite the transfer of the facility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>