<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 750 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349595</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, a textile manufacturer and exporter, in a case concerning the demand of service tax under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; on commission paid to foreign agents. The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax before 18.4.2006 was unsustainable due to jurisdictional limitations, and the appellant was entitled to an exemption under Notification No.14/2004-ST. As a result, the order demanding service tax was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:58:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 750 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349595</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, a textile manufacturer and exporter, in a case concerning the demand of service tax under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; on commission paid to foreign agents. The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax before 18.4.2006 was unsustainable due to jurisdictional limitations, and the appellant was entitled to an exemption under Notification No.14/2004-ST. As a result, the order demanding service tax was set aside, and the appellant was granted consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>