<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 741 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the control panels were classifiable under 8803 for parts of aircraft, not under 8537 as asserted by the department. Citing previous decisions and specific notifications exempting parts of aircraft, the Tribunal found the demand for duty to be unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:57:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 741 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the control panels were classifiable under 8803 for parts of aircraft, not under 8537 as asserted by the department. Citing previous decisions and specific notifications exempting parts of aircraft, the Tribunal found the demand for duty to be unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>