https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349578 Writ petitions challenging a reassessment order were not entertained because an appeal was already pending under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act. The court treated the taxability of land cost as a mixed question of law and fact suitable for examination by the First Appellate Authority, and allowed the petitioner to rely on the Supreme Court ruling already cited before that forum. The validity of the rectification rejection could also be raised in appeal. Liberty was granted to file an additional or amended memorandum of appeal within the stipulated time, and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349578 Writ petitions challenging a reassessment order were not entertained because an appeal was already pending under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act. The court treated the taxability of land cost as a mixed question of law and fact suitable for examination by the First Appellate Authority, and allowed the petitioner to rely on the Supreme Court ruling already cited before that forum. The validity of the rectification rejection could also be raised in appeal. Liberty was granted to file an additional or amended memorandum of appeal within the stipulated time, and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349578