<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application, recognizing the oversight in not considering the relevant decision during the appellate proceedings. The order was recalled to provide the assessee with an opportunity to present arguments based on the decision in the specific case. The cases were directed to be posted afresh for a new consideration in light of the overlooked decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 18:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application, recognizing the oversight in not considering the relevant decision during the appellate proceedings. The order was recalled to provide the assessee with an opportunity to present arguments based on the decision in the specific case. The cases were directed to be posted afresh for a new consideration in light of the overlooked decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>