<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 727 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349572</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the AO and CIT-A, dismissing the appeal on all grounds. The microfinance activities were considered commercial and not eligible for exemption under section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The provision for doubtful debts had already been considered in the previous year&#039;s assessment. As no arguments were presented regarding the additions of foreign and local grants, the appeal on those grounds was also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 727 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349572</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the AO and CIT-A, dismissing the appeal on all grounds. The microfinance activities were considered commercial and not eligible for exemption under section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The provision for doubtful debts had already been considered in the previous year&#039;s assessment. As no arguments were presented regarding the additions of foreign and local grants, the appeal on those grounds was also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>