<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 722 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349567</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the treatment of income from shareholders&#039; accounts, exemption of dividend income, and disallowance under section 14A r/w Rule 8D of the Rules. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that income from shareholders&#039; accounts should be treated similarly to income from the insurance business, dividend income subject to dividend distribution tax is exempt under section 10(34), and disallowance under section 14A does not apply to insurance companies covered by the special provisions of section 44. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on all three issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:52:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 722 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349567</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the treatment of income from shareholders&#039; accounts, exemption of dividend income, and disallowance under section 14A r/w Rule 8D of the Rules. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that income from shareholders&#039; accounts should be treated similarly to income from the insurance business, dividend income subject to dividend distribution tax is exempt under section 10(34), and disallowance under section 14A does not apply to insurance companies covered by the special provisions of section 44. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on all three issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>