<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 718 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349563</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s orders, dismissing appeals challenging a stay order, modification order, and consequential order. The Tribunal required partial deposits for waiver of duty and penalties, citing evidence of under-declared imports and disputed transactions. Financial hardship claims lacked substantiation, and procedural non-compliance was noted. The Court affirmed the discretionary nature of the orders, emphasizing evidence-based findings and denying modifications. The judgment underscored the significance of accurate transaction values and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions based on prima facie evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:52:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 718 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349563</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s orders, dismissing appeals challenging a stay order, modification order, and consequential order. The Tribunal required partial deposits for waiver of duty and penalties, citing evidence of under-declared imports and disputed transactions. Financial hardship claims lacked substantiation, and procedural non-compliance was noted. The Court affirmed the discretionary nature of the orders, emphasizing evidence-based findings and denying modifications. The judgment underscored the significance of accurate transaction values and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions based on prima facie evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>