<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 706 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349551</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of penalty under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant for non-filing of returns and non-payment of service tax. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of financial difficulties leading to delayed payment, the tribunal found evidence of malafide intentions in non-disclosure and non-filing of returns. Emphasizing the mandatory nature of penalty imposition in cases of suppression of facts, the tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s claims and upheld the penalty under section 78, concluding that the appellant&#039;s actions warranted the penalty due to non-compliance with legal obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:51:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 706 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349551</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of penalty under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellant for non-filing of returns and non-payment of service tax. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of financial difficulties leading to delayed payment, the tribunal found evidence of malafide intentions in non-disclosure and non-filing of returns. Emphasizing the mandatory nature of penalty imposition in cases of suppression of facts, the tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s claims and upheld the penalty under section 78, concluding that the appellant&#039;s actions warranted the penalty due to non-compliance with legal obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>