<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 705 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349550</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties under sections 76 and 78 while upholding the service tax demand, interest, and penalty under section 77. The decision considered the appellant&#039;s immediate payment upon notification, confusion regarding liability for service tax on TDS, and precedents supporting penalty waivers in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:51:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 705 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349550</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties under sections 76 and 78 while upholding the service tax demand, interest, and penalty under section 77. The decision considered the appellant&#039;s immediate payment upon notification, confusion regarding liability for service tax on TDS, and precedents supporting penalty waivers in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>