<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 704 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349549</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was unsustainable because penalty under section 78 had already been imposed for the same service tax default during an earlier period. The Tribunal applied the principle that the two penalties could not be levied simultaneously for the same offence for the relevant period, and noted that the amendment permitting simultaneous levy operated only from 10.05.2008. The assessee had paid the service tax with interest and discharged 25% of the section 78 penalty, so the section 76 penalty was set aside while the tax demand, interest, and reduced section 78 penalty were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:51:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 704 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349549</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was unsustainable because penalty under section 78 had already been imposed for the same service tax default during an earlier period. The Tribunal applied the principle that the two penalties could not be levied simultaneously for the same offence for the relevant period, and noted that the amendment permitting simultaneous levy operated only from 10.05.2008. The assessee had paid the service tax with interest and discharged 25% of the section 78 penalty, so the section 76 penalty was set aside while the tax demand, interest, and reduced section 78 penalty were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>