<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1324 - ITAT, AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the penalty order void ab initio due to a discrepancy between the reasons for initiating penalty proceedings and those recorded in the penalty order. Consequently, other grounds of appeal were not addressed, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed on January 22, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:21:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1324 - ITAT, AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the penalty order void ab initio due to a discrepancy between the reasons for initiating penalty proceedings and those recorded in the penalty order. Consequently, other grounds of appeal were not addressed, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed on January 22, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>