<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1350 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195138</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Company Law Board&#039;s order related to allegations of oppression and mismanagement in a company. The Court emphasized the limited scope of appeal under Section 10-F of the Companies Act to questions of law and upheld the Board&#039;s decision. The Court noted that unless the Board&#039;s findings are perverse, based on no evidence, or arbitrary, interference is not warranted, as the Board is the final authority on facts. The appeal was dismissed with liberty for the appellants to file a fresh application if needed, as the issues raised were deemed factual and did not involve substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:21:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1350 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195138</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Company Law Board&#039;s order related to allegations of oppression and mismanagement in a company. The Court emphasized the limited scope of appeal under Section 10-F of the Companies Act to questions of law and upheld the Board&#039;s decision. The Court noted that unless the Board&#039;s findings are perverse, based on no evidence, or arbitrary, interference is not warranted, as the Board is the final authority on facts. The appeal was dismissed with liberty for the appellants to file a fresh application if needed, as the issues raised were deemed factual and did not involve substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>