<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1167 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195155</link>
    <description>The tribunal annulled assessments for 2006-07 and 2007-08 due to lack of incriminating material. It allowed depreciation claim on &#039;Licence/Right to Collect Toll&#039; as an intangible asset for 2008-09 to 2011-12. The addition for suppression of toll receipts was restricted to the year with evidence, rejecting extrapolation for other years. Appeals for 2008-09 to 2011-12 were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1167 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195155</link>
      <description>The tribunal annulled assessments for 2006-07 and 2007-08 due to lack of incriminating material. It allowed depreciation claim on &#039;Licence/Right to Collect Toll&#039; as an intangible asset for 2008-09 to 2011-12. The addition for suppression of toll receipts was restricted to the year with evidence, rejecting extrapolation for other years. Appeals for 2008-09 to 2011-12 were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>