<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 928 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195130</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,36,76,461/- made by the A.O. under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to prove any benefit accrued to the assessee against the alleged liabilities, and the A.O. did not establish that the conditions for invoking Section 41(1) were met. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 928 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195130</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,36,76,461/- made by the A.O. under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the Revenue failed to prove any benefit accrued to the assessee against the alleged liabilities, and the A.O. did not establish that the conditions for invoking Section 41(1) were met. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>