<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 41 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10257</link>
    <description>The court held that the appeal filed by the petitioner should be considered pending once the delay was condoned by the Tribunal. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the application under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was deemed unjustified. The court set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and directed a reconsideration of the petitioner&#039;s application in accordance with the law. The writ petition was allowed, and parties were to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 41 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10257</link>
      <description>The court held that the appeal filed by the petitioner should be considered pending once the delay was condoned by the Tribunal. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the application under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was deemed unjustified. The court set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and directed a reconsideration of the petitioner&#039;s application in accordance with the law. The writ petition was allowed, and parties were to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>