<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1100 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195121</link>
    <description>The Court found errors in the computation of benefits under Section 54F and directed a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer to determine if the assessee met all requirements under Section 54. The Assessing Officer was instructed to consider the claim for deductions under Section 54 as per the law. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, granting relief for the full amount of Rs. 77,50,000 under Section 54F.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1100 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195121</link>
      <description>The Court found errors in the computation of benefits under Section 54F and directed a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer to determine if the assessee met all requirements under Section 54. The Assessing Officer was instructed to consider the claim for deductions under Section 54 as per the law. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, granting relief for the full amount of Rs. 77,50,000 under Section 54F.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>