<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 690 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349535</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the business expenses disallowance appeal by the Revenue, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the claimed expenditure under section 37 or section 57 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the expenses were necessary for statutory obligations and employment purposes, even though no business activity occurred due to ongoing litigation. The Tribunal emphasized that the business was not voluntarily discontinued, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 690 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349535</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the business expenses disallowance appeal by the Revenue, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the claimed expenditure under section 37 or section 57 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the expenses were necessary for statutory obligations and employment purposes, even though no business activity occurred due to ongoing litigation. The Tribunal emphasized that the business was not voluntarily discontinued, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>