<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 688 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349533</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the use of the Resale Price Method (RPM) as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for determining the arm&#039;s length price of international transactions where the assessee acted as a reseller without adding value. The department&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed, affirming the application of RPM over the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) due to the nature of the assessee&#039;s business model.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:18:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 688 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349533</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the use of the Resale Price Method (RPM) as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for determining the arm&#039;s length price of international transactions where the assessee acted as a reseller without adding value. The department&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed, affirming the application of RPM over the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) due to the nature of the assessee&#039;s business model.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>