<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 687 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, excluding certain comparables for benchmarking international transactions and upholding the addition of the rent equalisation reserve to book profits. The issues of penalty proceedings and interest charges were considered premature and consequential, respectively. The appeal was disposed of with specific directions for reassessment based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 687 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, excluding certain comparables for benchmarking international transactions and upholding the addition of the rent equalisation reserve to book profits. The issues of penalty proceedings and interest charges were considered premature and consequential, respectively. The appeal was disposed of with specific directions for reassessment based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>