<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 668 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349513</link>
    <description>A pending and unimplemented arbitral award does not, by itself, extinguish a statutory oppression and mismanagement remedy under the Companies Act where the family arrangement remains disputed. The Tribunal retained jurisdiction because such proceedings are distinct from arbitral adjudication and continue until the award attains finality and is implemented. Pending that position, the Tribunal considered interim corporate governance measures necessary to protect the company&#039;s affairs, including supervision of management, audits, reporting safeguards, and control over major corporate actions. Interim administrative directions were therefore issued to preserve the company pending final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 668 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349513</link>
      <description>A pending and unimplemented arbitral award does not, by itself, extinguish a statutory oppression and mismanagement remedy under the Companies Act where the family arrangement remains disputed. The Tribunal retained jurisdiction because such proceedings are distinct from arbitral adjudication and continue until the award attains finality and is implemented. Pending that position, the Tribunal considered interim corporate governance measures necessary to protect the company&#039;s affairs, including supervision of management, audits, reporting safeguards, and control over major corporate actions. Interim administrative directions were therefore issued to preserve the company pending final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>