https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349496 The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found that the services provided to the job workers indirectly contributed to the final product's manufacture, aligning with the decision in Maruti Suzuki. The Tribunal emphasized that input services need not be used within the manufacturer's premises, referencing the ruling in MRF Ltd. The respondent's reliance on Rule 4(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules was accepted, allowing them to avail credit for services provided at the job worker's premises. The cross objection was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:16:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349496 The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found that the services provided to the job workers indirectly contributed to the final product's manufacture, aligning with the decision in Maruti Suzuki. The Tribunal emphasized that input services need not be used within the manufacturer's premises, referencing the ruling in MRF Ltd. The respondent's reliance on Rule 4(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules was accepted, allowing them to avail credit for services provided at the job worker's premises. The cross objection was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349496