<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 643 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349488</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the revisions, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders. It held that the purchases made by the Branch Office in U.P. were part of inter-State trade and thus not taxable under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The Court also dismissed the need to address the best judgment assessment due to its primary conclusion on the taxability of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 643 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349488</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the revisions, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders. It held that the purchases made by the Branch Office in U.P. were part of inter-State trade and thus not taxable under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The Court also dismissed the need to address the best judgment assessment due to its primary conclusion on the taxability of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>