<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 998 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed part of the appeal in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of interest expenditure and the confirmation of interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act. The Tribunal remanded the matters back to the First Appellate Authority and the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication based on legal precedents and considerations, partially upholding the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 998 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed part of the appeal in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of interest expenditure and the confirmation of interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act. The Tribunal remanded the matters back to the First Appellate Authority and the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication based on legal precedents and considerations, partially upholding the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>