<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1149 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195116</link>
    <description>Where an assessee&#039;s own funds exceeded the investments, interest expenditure was held not attributable for disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D. The disallowance was also confined to the actual expenditure incurred and claimed, so the Assessing Officer had to recompute it by considering only the identified expenditure items, including the assessee&#039;s suo motu disallowances. The result was a restricted disallowance with no inclusion of interest on the facts recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1149 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195116</link>
      <description>Where an assessee&#039;s own funds exceeded the investments, interest expenditure was held not attributable for disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D. The disallowance was also confined to the actual expenditure incurred and claimed, so the Assessing Officer had to recompute it by considering only the identified expenditure items, including the assessee&#039;s suo motu disallowances. The result was a restricted disallowance with no inclusion of interest on the facts recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>