https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195114 Appellate remand powers under the Code of Civil Procedure are co-extensive with those of the court of first instance, and framing issues before remand under Order 41 Rule 25 is discretionary rather than mandatory. A de novo remand may therefore be appropriate where a limited remand would fragment the controversy. In company winding-up proceedings involving land claims, the overriding pari passu priority of workmen's dues and secured creditors' claims under section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956 must be considered alongside land-ceiling proceedings. Failure to address that statutory priority requires fresh consideration of competing claims to company assets. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2017 13:52:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195114 Appellate remand powers under the Code of Civil Procedure are co-extensive with those of the court of first instance, and framing issues before remand under Order 41 Rule 25 is discretionary rather than mandatory. A de novo remand may therefore be appropriate where a limited remand would fragment the controversy. In company winding-up proceedings involving land claims, the overriding pari passu priority of workmen's dues and secured creditors' claims under section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956 must be considered alongside land-ceiling proceedings. Failure to address that statutory priority requires fresh consideration of competing claims to company assets. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195114