<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 991 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195114</link>
    <description>The article explains that an appellate court may remand a company matter for de novo consideration without first framing issues or limiting the remand, because the remand power is discretionary and not confined by any rigid procedural requirement. It also states that, in proceedings concerning assets of a company in liquidation, the company court must consider the overriding priority given by section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956 to workmen&#039;s dues and secured creditors&#039; claims. That statutory pari passu priority cannot be overlooked in favour of a proceeding under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The matter was therefore directed to be reheard afresh, with all contentions left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2017 13:52:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 991 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195114</link>
      <description>The article explains that an appellate court may remand a company matter for de novo consideration without first framing issues or limiting the remand, because the remand power is discretionary and not confined by any rigid procedural requirement. It also states that, in proceedings concerning assets of a company in liquidation, the company court must consider the overriding priority given by section 529-A of the Companies Act, 1956 to workmen&#039;s dues and secured creditors&#039; claims. That statutory pari passu priority cannot be overlooked in favour of a proceeding under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The matter was therefore directed to be reheard afresh, with all contentions left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>