https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195110 Land acquisition notification issued mainly in obedience to an earlier court direction was held unsustainable because the acquiring authority did not show independent statutory satisfaction. The court found that urgency powers under Section 17 could not be invoked mechanically to dispense with the Section 5A objection process, and that the record did not disclose a fresh, reasoned assessment supporting urgency or the acquisition decision. The earlier order was also treated as not binding on the petitioners, who were not parties to it, and had been passed without reasons or hearing the affected owner. The notification was quashed for non-application of mind and improper invocation of urgency powers. en-us Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:53:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195110 Land acquisition notification issued mainly in obedience to an earlier court direction was held unsustainable because the acquiring authority did not show independent statutory satisfaction. The court found that urgency powers under Section 17 could not be invoked mechanically to dispense with the Section 5A objection process, and that the record did not disclose a fresh, reasoned assessment supporting urgency or the acquisition decision. The earlier order was also treated as not binding on the petitioners, who were not parties to it, and had been passed without reasons or hearing the affected owner. The notification was quashed for non-application of mind and improper invocation of urgency powers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195110