https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195109 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable when filed by the general secretary of an association on behalf of ex-employees, because a person who is not personally aggrieved cannot invoke writ jurisdiction as a representative unless statute expressly permits it. Section 36 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 did not assist outside that Act's proceedings, and Section 13 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 was inapplicable because the petition was not brought by a registered trade union in its own name. The Court also found that relief had not been shown to have been demanded from a competent authority, since delegation to the Zonal Manager was not proved and the Corporation was not impleaded. en-us Thu, 16 Jun 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:34:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195109 A writ petition under Article 226 was held not maintainable when filed by the general secretary of an association on behalf of ex-employees, because a person who is not personally aggrieved cannot invoke writ jurisdiction as a representative unless statute expressly permits it. Section 36 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 did not assist outside that Act's proceedings, and Section 13 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 was inapplicable because the petition was not brought by a registered trade union in its own name. The Court also found that relief had not been shown to have been demanded from a competent authority, since delegation to the Zonal Manager was not proved and the Corporation was not impleaded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jun 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195109