https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195107 After the omission of Order 18, Rule 17-A and the insertion of Order 7, Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, documents not produced with the plaint are not absolutely excluded from evidence. The provisions were read harmoniously to preserve the court's power to grant leave for reception of such documents at the hearing, even where they were omitted from the plaint schedule. The trial court's view that such evidence could never be received was incorrect, and the refusal to allow the plaintiff's application was unsustainable. en-us Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:13:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195107 After the omission of Order 18, Rule 17-A and the insertion of Order 7, Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, documents not produced with the plaint are not absolutely excluded from evidence. The provisions were read harmoniously to preserve the court's power to grant leave for reception of such documents at the hearing, even where they were omitted from the plaint schedule. The trial court's view that such evidence could never be received was incorrect, and the refusal to allow the plaintiff's application was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195107