https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195106 Delhi High Court considered whether it was the proper forum for a testamentary dispute and whether a protective injunction should restrain trustees and supporting defendants from dealing with the estate or pursuing parallel proceedings. It held that territorial jurisdiction and forum conveniens were established by the Delhi connections of the wills, the deceased, the beneficiary and executrix, and the estate's Indian nexus, so the jurisdictional objection failed. It further found that a permanent injunction was justified to preserve the estate, prevent dissipation of assets, and avoid parallel proceedings that could frustrate pending probate and testamentary adjudication. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:06:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195106 Delhi High Court considered whether it was the proper forum for a testamentary dispute and whether a protective injunction should restrain trustees and supporting defendants from dealing with the estate or pursuing parallel proceedings. It held that territorial jurisdiction and forum conveniens were established by the Delhi connections of the wills, the deceased, the beneficiary and executrix, and the estate's Indian nexus, so the jurisdictional objection failed. It further found that a permanent injunction was justified to preserve the estate, prevent dissipation of assets, and avoid parallel proceedings that could frustrate pending probate and testamentary adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195106