<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 54 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting registration to the assessee-firm despite initial rejection by the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Appeals. The delay in filing the partnership deed was condoned due to genuine reasons, including inadvertent retention by the authorized representative. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the firm&#039;s genuineness and valid reasons for the delay, dismissing the appeal and affirming registration for the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 54 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting registration to the assessee-firm despite initial rejection by the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Appeals. The delay in filing the partnership deed was condoned due to genuine reasons, including inadvertent retention by the authorized representative. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the firm&#039;s genuineness and valid reasons for the delay, dismissing the appeal and affirming registration for the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>