https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349484 The High Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a stay petition with the second respondent to suspend the tax demand while their appeal was pending. The Court instructed the second respondent to hold the notice in abeyance for two weeks, allowing the petitioner to submit an application for stay. The second respondent was required to provide a personal hearing and issue a reasoned order on the stay petition. The petitioner was directed to establish a prima facie case for staying the tax demand, with the notice being kept on hold until a decision was reached. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, providing a procedural framework for the petitioner's protection during the appeal process. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2017 07:57:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349484 The High Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a stay petition with the second respondent to suspend the tax demand while their appeal was pending. The Court instructed the second respondent to hold the notice in abeyance for two weeks, allowing the petitioner to submit an application for stay. The second respondent was required to provide a personal hearing and issue a reasoned order on the stay petition. The petitioner was directed to establish a prima facie case for staying the tax demand, with the notice being kept on hold until a decision was reached. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, providing a procedural framework for the petitioner's protection during the appeal process. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349484